Mitchell 300 Cosmetic Changes.

Discussions On All Vintage Mitchell Reels...
Post Reply
User avatar
Schrack
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:35 am
Location: Dover, Delawhere?

Mitchell 300 Cosmetic Changes.

Post by Schrack »

Do you still have the article on Cosmetic Changes.
What was the year 300 was added to case?
I am interested on markings on the 300's, any changes and what year they were done.
Any other changes like handle, spools, and anti reverse butterfly to single lever.
This helps spot any alteration on Reels.
Any information will be helpful.
Thank You.


User avatar
Schrack
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:35 am
Location: Dover, Delawhere?

Re: Mitchell 300 Cosmetic Changes.

Post by Schrack »

Am interested in knowing what year 300 was added to left case.


User avatar
Ted Lanham
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:00 pm

Re: Mitchell 300 Cosmetic Changes.

Post by Ted Lanham »

Schrack,
It sounds like you have developed a real interest in the Mitchell 300 reels. In my opinion, it's time for you to consider buying the book" The Mitchell Classic 300 Spinning Reel: 1939-1989" written by Wallace. It can answer most of questions about changes to the reel and when they were made. Ebay has a seller that has a couple of them, and there's an outfit named Whitefish Press that may have some. They have a cost of around $50, but they are well worth it.

The "300" was added to the cover plate around 1955.

Regards,
Ted Lanham


User avatar
Schrack
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:35 am
Location: Dover, Delawhere?

Re: Mitchell 300 Cosmetic Changes.

Post by Schrack »

Roger Dat on the book.
So several 55's I have are ok, they have right Ser. # but have 300 on case.
I have been hooked on the 300' s since 1956, when I was 10 painted neighbors house trim.
Made enough to buy a Mitchell 300 and rod.
Used it till 63, when I went in Air Force my parents gave it away. Bought another.
Love the early ones 54,55.
I thought I had alot Till I saw some of the serious collectors, lol.
Love The Mitchell' s


Post Reply